Published on May 26, 2025 • 6 min read
Parking a $2 million aircraft in a building that started as a cattle shed presents unique challenges. Aircraft hangar configurations often feature support columns in inconvenient locations and triangular corners that create problematic dead zones.
FBO managers dealing with oddly-shaped hangars face common challenges. From converted farm buildings to WWII-era structures with frequent support pillars, the aviation industry utilizes many storage spaces originally designed for other purposes.
At Poplar Grove Airport in Illinois, Dick Thomas literally transformed his family farm into an airport in 1972. His first "hangars"? The existing cattle sheds. While charming in a historical sense, imagine explaining to a Gulfstream owner that their jet will be sleeping where Bessie used to moo.
This isn't just ancient history. Across the country, FBOs are still dealing with converted warehouses, repurposed industrial buildings, and structures that were clearly designed for anything but aircraft. These conversions often feature:
When your hangar started life as something else entirely
Modern hangars boast "clear span" construction—engineering speak for "no columns to crash into." But visit any airport built before 1990, and you'll find hangars dotted with support columns like a concrete obstacle course.
One pilot on an aviation forum described their multi-span hangar experience: "Everything in my hangar has wheels. Not because I like mobility, but because I need to play Tetris every time someone wants their plane out." Another mentioned needing wing walkers at all four corners just to navigate between columns—turning a simple repositioning into a six-person operation.
The real kicker? Insurance companies know these layouts are trouble. Industry data shows hangar rash incidents account for 40% of all ground damage claims, with average repair costs ranging from $25,000 for minor wing damage to $200,000+ for structural repairs involving control surfaces. Factor in aircraft downtime—typically 2-6 weeks depending on parts availability—and you're looking at lost revenue that can exceed the repair costs themselves.
Then there are the truly bizarre configurations. Take the Tustin Blimp Hangars in California—17 stories high and built almost entirely of wood because steel was scarce during WWII. Each could hold six blimps, which sounds impressive until you try to fit modern business jets into a space designed for giant balloons.
Or consider Quonset huts—those semi-circular corrugated steel structures that dot older airports. Sure, they're 100% clear span, but their curved walls create unusable space along the edges. One FBO manager described it perfectly: "It's like trying to park in a giant tin can. The center's great, but good luck using those last 10 feet on either side."
Quonset huts: Great for avoiding columns, terrible for maximizing square footage
But perhaps nothing beats the shared hangar squeeze. Picture this: a 40x40 hangar with three aircraft, where "wingtips touch underwing" isn't a figure of speech—it's Tuesday.
Real pilot testimonials from aviation forums paint a sweaty picture:
The consensus? It's a recipe for hangar rash, with diagonal parking and aircraft dollies becoming survival tools rather than conveniences.
While you can't relocate that concrete column, technology can dramatically reduce incidents:
Proximity Warning Systems:
Advanced Towing Equipment:
Planning Software: Modern hangar management systems like AirPlx's 3D AutoStack don't just visualize—they calculate:
 Modern software helping FBOs make the most of challenging hangar layouts
Case Study 1: Regional FBO Column Challenge A 100-year-old hangar in the Northeast with 8 support columns saw a 60% reduction in incidents after implementing:
Case Study 2: Converted Warehouse Transformation A former automotive warehouse turned aircraft hangar increased capacity by 40% through:
Case Study 3: Multi-Tenant Quonset Hut Optimization A 1940s-era Quonset hut maximized unusable curved space by:
Phase 1: Assessment and Documentation (Week 1-2)
Comprehensive Space Audit:
Historical Analysis:
Phase 2: Equipment Investment (Month 2) 3. Strategic Equipment Purchases:
Phase 3: Process Development (Month 3) 4. Standard Operating Procedures:
Phase 4: Training and Certification (Ongoing) 5. Competency-Based Training:
Phase 5: Revenue Optimization 6. Maximize Utilization:
The Business Case for Improvement:
A typical oddly-shaped hangar improvement program costs $50,000-$100,000 but delivers:
ROI Timeline: Most FBOs see payback within 12-18 months, with ongoing benefits that compound annually.
Week 1: Quick Wins ($0-$5,000)
Week 2: Safety Investments ($5,000-$15,000)
Week 3: Process Optimization ($2,000-$8,000)
Week 4: Revenue Enhancement ($10,000-$25,000)
90-Day Follow-up Metrics:
Remember, even the weirdest hangar beats leaving aircraft on the ramp. And who knows? That converted cattle shed might just give your FBO some character—and with the right improvements, profitability too.
Optimize Your Odd-Shaped Hangar with AirPlx
Dealing with columns, weird angles, or converted buildings? AirPlx's 3D visualization and optimization tools help you maximize every square foot—no matter how strange the shape.