Published on June 16, 2025 • 6 min read
A Gulfstream G650 owner called last week, frustrated after being told his FBO was out of hangar space. But looking at the hangar photo he sent, three empty spots were clearly visible. The problem wasn't space; it was how they were moving aircraft.
Conventional towbar tugs limit hangar stacking efficiency, leaving money and space unused. Modern towbarless and remote-controlled tugs can increase hangar capacity by 40-60%, sometimes doubling it. Here's what actually works in 2025.
Before diving into equipment specs, understand that not all hangars are created equal. Your capacity gains depend heavily on:
Hangar Design Factors:
Aircraft Mix Considerations:
Operational Constraints:
A five-unit fleet of electric tugs saves approximately $13,000 annually in fuel costs alone. But that's pocket change compared to the real money: hangar revenue. One FBO owner recently said: "I didn't need to build another hangar to increase my revenue—purchasing the Mototok did that for me."
Traditional tugs need wide aisles for maneuvering due to physical constraints. Towbarless tugs with zero-degree turning can park a Citation against the wall with inches to spare, translating to 2-3 extra aircraft per hangar at well-run operations.
LEKTRO's 88 Series dominates this category with proven track record across major FBOs. With capacity ratings up to 120,000 lbs (verify with manufacturer for your specific aircraft), it handles everything from King Airs to large-cabin jets. The hydraulic cradle scoops up the nose gear in 15 seconds—no bars, no hassle.
Key specs that matter:
A towbarless tug positions a Gulfstream G550 with surgical precision—no aisles needed
Mototok remote-controlled tugs excel in tight quarters where precision matters most. An operator can walk around the aircraft while steering via remote, parking jets in spots that would be impossible with a ride-on tug.
Multiple FBOs have achieved 40-50% capacity increases with proper remote-controlled tugs. At typical hangar rates of $2,500-4,000/month per spot, each additional aircraft generates $30,000-48,000 annually. The math becomes compelling when you're turning away customers due to "full" hangars.
If you're handling everything from PC-12s to BBJs, LEKTRO's 8950 Series (210,000 lbs capacity) is your Swiss Army knife. It's the first TLTV certified for new Boeing aircraft, meaning you won't damage that $80 million asset while maximizing hangar density.
Environmental benefits aside, the financial case for electric tugs is compelling:
Operating Costs (Daily):
Hidden Costs to Consider:
Electric tugs also eliminate oil changes, transmission repairs, and diesel exhaust in your climate-controlled hangar—something your maintenance team will appreciate.
Five-year total cost of ownership: Electric tugs win by a landslide
One damaged nose gear on a G650 costs more than a fleet of premium tugs. Modern units include:
An important note from FAA Advisory Circular AC 00-34B: Match your tug capacity to aircraft weight properly. An oversized tug can damage nose gear just as quickly as an undersized one.
Before you order that shiny new tug, consider these operational factors that can make or break your investment:
Hangar Layout Constraints:
Training and Certification:
Maintenance Considerations:
Integration Timeline:
The electric aircraft tug market is growing at 5.1% annually, and three technology trends are driving this growth:
Let's break down the realistic math for your operation:
Phase 1: Assessment (Month 1-2)
Phase 2: Implementation Costs
Phase 3: Payback Timeline
Factor in ramp-up time (3-6 months), seasonal variations, and maintenance downtime. Most successful FBOs see full ROI within 24 months, sometimes sooner if they're consistently turning away customers.
Ready to Stack Smarter?
Download our free Hangar Capacity Calculator to see exactly how many more aircraft you could fit with the right tugs. Includes tug recommendations based on your fleet mix.
Same hangar, 50% more aircraft—just by upgrading to towbarless tugs